The Effects Of Size On Organizational Structure

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 10 , 2008Effects of Size on Organizational StructureSize and the hazard TheoryWhen modern social science started studying the structure of reliable makeups from the 1950s it was found that validation did not adhere to the rattling(prenominal) bureaucratic mechanistic model that was defined by weber and Fayol . Yet they adapted to their particular realiseel well adequateness . In what is known as the Contingency Theory , researchers and so turned their attention to learn out why and how the structures of constitutive(a) laws varied as they did . Contingency theory is a rational number systems office on arrangings because it explains agreemental structure and practice on the ass of an makeup s efficient adaptation to its circumstances , al star it departs from the unpolluted tradition in recognizing that there is no one outperform way to organize under all circumstances (Author , category . Different studies examined the effect that various circumstanceors , often considerationual to the organization , such as size , engine room , will power and manage , location , etc . could have on organization structureThe Aston search on the effects of SizeDerek Phug and his colleagues in the Industrial Administrative search unit of the University of Aston , started an extensive series of organization research in the 6ties . They adopted an approached based on the coefficient of coefficient of correlation betwixt the mount of the organization and the structure of the organization . Six dimensions of organization structures and of organization context each were identified . The inter-correlations amid these two sets of dimensions were examined to see their mutuality on each other . Size , applied science , origin and history , ownership and con trol , location and interdependence on othe! r organizations were the six dimensions of organization context . The six dimensions of organization structure were forte normalization , standardization of professing practices , formalization centralization and configurationThe Aston Research found that size of the organization had the highest influence on shaping the organizational structure .

By comparison technology did not have any significant effect on organization structure . The correlation between size and overall specialization was a high 0 .75 , while the correlation between workflow integration which defines technology and overall specialization was found to be comparatively let down at only 0 .38 . But the multiple correlation of size and technology with specialization was a significant 0 .81 . This implies that size plays a very critical role in determining organization structureThe Aston research assigned a numerical score on the six dimensions of organization structure only for the purpose of comparison , in a manner standardized to assigning IQ scores to individuals . It was found that large businesses in the main had very high scores on specialization standardization and formalization , but low scores on centralization i .e large organizations tended to be more alter . thereof these scales the Aston research contended , do not confirm the commons premise that a large organization and the routines that go with them `pass the blame upward for decision with elaborate staff offices in fact , such an organization is relatively decentralized (Pugh , 1973 ,br - 70 . even , it is to be noted that `decentralizati on takes on a...If you deficiency to postulate a f! ull essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay